How Apple Music Is Paying Out Artists Compared to Spotify, Amazon Music, and YouTube

AI-created, human-reviewed.

The battle between music streaming services continues to heat up, with recent data from Duetti revealing striking differences in how much artists earn from various platforms. While Spotify maintains its position as the industry's largest streaming service, it's facing criticism over its comparatively low payout rates to artists. On a recent episode of MacBreak Weekly, Leo Laporte, Andy Ihnatko, Alex Lindsay, and guest Mikah Sargent dove into the data Duetti published on the streaming platform payout rates.

According to Duetti's latest report, the disparity in artist compensation across platforms is significant. Spotify currently offers the lowest rate, $3.00 per thousand streams, while Apple Music more than doubles that figure, $6.20. YouTube Music sits in the middle, at $4.80, with Amazon Music leading the pack at an impressive $8.80 per thousand streams.

When it comes to streaming payouts, Amazon Music's leading position at $8.80 per thousand streams comes with an interesting caveat. Industry analysts suggest this higher payout rate might be influenced by Amazon's unique subscription model, where many users have access to the service through their Prime membership but don't actively use it. This creates a situation where there's consistent revenue from subscriptions but potentially lower overall streaming numbers, resulting in higher per-stream rates.

YouTube Music's middle-ground position at $4.80 per thousand streams reflects its hybrid model, combining traditional music streaming with its vast user-generated content platform. The service benefits from Google's extensive advertising infrastructure, though it still pays significantly less than Apple Music or Amazon Music.

Spotify's response to these findings has been notably defensive. The streaming giant argues that per-stream calculations aren't meaningful metrics, instead emphasizing their total payout figures in the billions and their massive user base. They've highlighted their role in "growing the pie," pointing to statistics showing that over 10,000 artists now generate more than $100,000 annually through their platform alone.

Spotify's response to these findings has been notably defensive. The streaming giant argues that per-stream calculations aren't meaningful metrics, instead emphasizing their total payout figures in the billions and their massive user base. They've highlighted their role in "growing the pie," pointing to statistics showing that over 10,000 artists now generate more than $100,000 annually through their platform alone.

However, industry experts remain skeptical of Spotify's claims. Music industry veterans and analysts note that most artists aren't seeing the kind of success Spotify promotes. Instead, musicians typically treat streaming revenue as a loss leader for concert tickets and merchandise sales, which continue to be their primary income sources.

The quality difference between services has also become a talking point. Apple Music has gained favor among audiophiles for its lossless audio offerings, while Spotify has faced criticism over its playlist curation practices. There are concerns about Spotify's use of AI-generated content and commissioned artists in their playlists, potentially diluting the platform's value for genuine artists.

The streaming landscape represents a significant shift from the traditional record label system. While the old model concentrated wealth among a small number of superstar artists, today's streaming platforms theoretically offer more opportunities for mid-tier musicians to earn a living. However, the reality appears more complex, with many artists needing to diversify their revenue streams across multiple platforms and income sources.

As streaming continues to dominate music consumption, the discussion around fair compensation for artists remains crucial. While Spotify's massive user base provides unparalleled reach, competing services like Apple Music and Amazon Music appear to be setting new standards for artist compensation in the streaming era.